Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 5-20 , March 2005

Judgment processes in older adults' drug benefit evaluations

References 

  1. Health Policy Alternatives. Prescription Drug Coverage for Medicare Beneficiaries: A Summary of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. Menlo Park, Calif: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2003;
  2. Moon M. How Beneficiaries Fare Under the New Medicare Drug Bill. (Issue Brief #730). New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2004;
  3. Congressional Budget Office . Issues in Designing a Prescription Drug Benefit for Medicare. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office; 2002;
  4. Hoffman PJ. The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychol Bull. 1960;57:116–131
  5. Einhorn HJ. The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychol Bull. 1970;73:221–230
  6. Peter JP, Olson JC. Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy. Boston, Mass: Irwin McGraw Hill; 1999;
  7. Dawes RM, Corrigan B. Linear models in decision making. Psychol Bull. 1974;81:95–106
  8. Holdford D, Carroll NV. Consumer preferences for types of cost containment in prescription drug plans. J Man Care Pharm. 2002;8:192–198
  9. Cline RR, Mott DA. Demand for a Medicare prescription drug benefit: exploring consumer preferences under a managed competition framework. Inquiry. 2003;40:169–183
  10. Hammond KR, Stewart TR, Brehmer B, Steinmann DO. Social judgment theory. In:  Arkes HR,  Hammond KR editor. Judgment and Decision Making. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1986;
  11. Cooksey RW. Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1996;
  12. Brunswik E. Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychol Rev. 1955;62:193–217
  13. Engel JD, Wigton R, LaDuca A, Blacklow RS. A social judgment theory perspective on clinical problem solving. Eval Health Prof. 1990;13:63–78
  14. Churchill GA. Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations. 6th ed. Fort Worth, Tex: Harcourt Brace; 1995;
  15. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 3rd ed.. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2000;
  16. Sroka CJ. Medicare: Beneficiary Cost-sharing Under Proposed Prescription Drug Benefits. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service (order code RL31525); 2003;
  17. Einhorn HJ. Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information. Org Behav Human Perform. 1971;6:1–27
  18. Goldberg LR. Five models of clinical judgment: an empirical comparison between linear and nonlinear representations of the human inference process. Org Behav Hum Perform. 1971;6:458–479
  19. Brannick MT, Brannick JP. Nonlinear and noncompensatory processes in performance evaluation. Org Behav Hum Decis Process. 1989;44:97–122
  20. Ganzach Y. Theory and configurality in expert and layperson judgment. J Appl Psychol. 1994;79:439–448
  21. Stevens SS. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science. 1946;103:677–680
  22. Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied Multiple Correlation/Regression for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1983;
  23. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ. The adaptive decision maker: effort and accuracy in choice. In:  Hogarth RM editors. Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1990;
  24. Public Opinion Strategies , Peter D. Hart Research Associates. Reactions to the New Medicare Law. Menlo Park, Calif: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2004;
  25. Hibbard JH, Jewett JJ. What type of quality information do consumers want in a report card?. Med Care Res Rev. 1996;53:28–47
  26. Hibbard JH, Jewett JJ. Will quality report cards help consumers?. Health Aff. 1997;16:218–228
  27. Wiggins N, Hoffman PJ. Three models of clinical judgment. J Abnormal Psychol. 1968;73:70–77
  28. Hoffman PJ. The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychol Bull. 1960;57:116–131
  29. Payne JW, Braunstein ML, Carroll JS. Exploring predecisional behavioral: an alternative approach to decision research. Org Behav Hum Decis Process. 1978;22:17–44
  30. Russo JE, Rosen LD. An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice. Memory Cog. 1975;3:267–276

PII: S1551-7411(04)00005-1

doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2004.12.004

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 5-20 , March 2005