« Previous
Next »
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 1, Issue 1
, Pages 5-20
, March 2005
Judgment processes in older adults' drug benefit evaluations⋆
References
- Health Policy Alternatives. Prescription Drug Coverage for Medicare Beneficiaries: A Summary of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. Menlo Park, Calif: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2003;
- . How Beneficiaries Fare Under the New Medicare Drug Bill. (Issue Brief #730). New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 2004;
- . Issues in Designing a Prescription Drug Benefit for Medicare. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office; 2002;
- . The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychol Bull. 1960;57:116–131
- . The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychol Bull. 1970;73:221–230
- . Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy. Boston, Mass: Irwin McGraw Hill; 1999;
- . Linear models in decision making. Psychol Bull. 1974;81:95–106
- . Consumer preferences for types of cost containment in prescription drug plans. J Man Care Pharm. 2002;8:192–198
- . Demand for a Medicare prescription drug benefit: exploring consumer preferences under a managed competition framework. Inquiry. 2003;40:169–183
- . Social judgment theory. In: Arkes HR, Hammond KR editor. Judgment and Decision Making. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1986;
- . Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1996;
- . Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychol Rev. 1955;62:193–217
- . A social judgment theory perspective on clinical problem solving. Eval Health Prof. 1990;13:63–78
- . Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations. 6th ed. Fort Worth, Tex: Harcourt Brace; 1995;
- . Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 3rd ed.. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2000;
- . Medicare: Beneficiary Cost-sharing Under Proposed Prescription Drug Benefits. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service (order code RL31525); 2003;
- . Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information. Org Behav Human Perform. 1971;6:1–27
- . Five models of clinical judgment: an empirical comparison between linear and nonlinear representations of the human inference process. Org Behav Hum Perform. 1971;6:458–479
- . Nonlinear and noncompensatory processes in performance evaluation. Org Behav Hum Decis Process. 1989;44:97–122
- . Theory and configurality in expert and layperson judgment. J Appl Psychol. 1994;79:439–448
- . On the theory of scales of measurement. Science. 1946;103:677–680
- . Applied Multiple Correlation/Regression for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1983;
- . The adaptive decision maker: effort and accuracy in choice. In: Hogarth RM editors. Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1990;
- . Hart Research Associates. Reactions to the New Medicare Law. Menlo Park, Calif: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2004;
- . What type of quality information do consumers want in a report card?. Med Care Res Rev. 1996;53:28–47
- . Will quality report cards help consumers?. Health Aff. 1997;16:218–228
- . Three models of clinical judgment. J Abnormal Psychol. 1968;73:70–77
- . The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychol Bull. 1960;57:116–131
- . Exploring predecisional behavioral: an alternative approach to decision research. Org Behav Hum Decis Process. 1978;22:17–44
- . An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice. Memory Cog. 1975;3:267–276
PII: S1551-7411(04)00005-1
doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2004.12.004
© 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 1, Issue 1
, Pages 5-20
, March 2005
