Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 251-269, June 2005

Drug information–seeking intention and behavior after exposure to direct-to-consumer advertisement of prescription drugs

  • Yifei Liu, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Pharmaceutical Socioeconomics, S-532 PHAR, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 319 335 7960; fax: +1 319 353 5646.
  • ,
  • William R. Doucette, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Pharmaceutical Socioeconomics, S-532 PHAR, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
  • ,
  • Karen B. Farris, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Pharmaceutical Socioeconomics, S-532 PHAR, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
  • ,
  • Dhananjay Nayakankuppam, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Marketing, Henry B. Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA

Abstract 

Background

Concerns about direct-to-consumer advertisement's (DTCA's) information quality have raised interest in patients' drug information–seeking after DTCA exposure.

Objective

To identify predictors of patients' intentions and behaviors to seek drug information from physicians, pharmacists, and the Internet after DTCA exposure, using theories of planned behavior and self-efficacy.

Methods

One thousand patients were randomly selected from 3,000 nationwide osteoarthritic patients. A self-administered survey examined predictors of intention including measurements of attitude toward behavior, subjective norm, perceived difficulty, self-efficacy, controllability, self-identity, intention, exposure to ads, and control variables. After 6 weeks, another survey measured respondents' information-seeking behavior. For patients exposed to DTCA, 6 multiple regressions were performed for information-seeking intention and behavior for 3 information sources: physicians, pharmacists, and the Internet.

Results

The response rates were 61.9% and 80.1% for the first survey and the second survey, respectively. Four hundred and fifty-four participants reported exposure to DTCA about arthritis prescription medicines in the previous month. Over 41% of the variance in intention and over 18% of the variance in behavior were explained by the regression procedures. The consistent positive predictors of intention were attitude toward behavior, self-identity, attitude toward DTCAs of arthritis medication, and osteoarthritis pain; while the consistent positive predictors of behavior were intention and osteoarthritis pain. The strongest predictors of intention were self-identity for physicians, subjective norm for pharmacists, and attitude toward behavior for the Internet. Perceived difficulty and self-efficacy did not predict intention, and self-efficacy and controllability did not predict behavior.

Conclusions

DTCA-prompted drug information–seeking may be under patients' complete volitional control. To promote information searching, efforts could be made to affect factors predicting intention. Interventions could address patients' attitude toward behavior, the influence of their important others, and their role as information seeker, respectively, for information sources like the Internet, pharmacists, and physicians.

Keywords: DTCA, Drug information, Self-care, Theory of planned behavior, Self-efficacy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1551-7411(05)00042-2

doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.03.010

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 1, Issue 2 , Pages 251-269, June 2005