Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 1, Issue 4 , Pages 526-545, December 2005

Perspectives on Drug and Therapeutics Committee policy implementation

  • Ee Lyn Tan, B.Pharm., B.PharmSci. (Hons.), Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    • Therapeutics Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, 380 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst 2010, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Therapeutics Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, 380 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst 2010, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 83822199; fax: +61 2 83822724.
  • ,
  • Richard O. Day, M.D., F.R.A.C.P.

      Affiliations

    • Therapeutics Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, 380 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst 2010, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    • Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    • Tel.: +61 2 83822331; fax: +61 2 83828382.
  • ,
  • Jo-anne E. Brien, B.Pharm., BS.(Pharm.), Pharm.D.

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
    • Therapeutics Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, 380 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst 2010, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
    • Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
    • Tel.: +61 2 83822605; fax: +61 2 83824219.

Abstract 

Background

Drug and therapeutics committees (DTCs) are expected to make difficult decisions that may have an impact on the clinical and economic outcomes of drug use. There have been few studies investigating the barriers to DTC policy implementation, and little is known about ways to improve the process.

Objectives

The specific objectives of this qualitative study were to explore stakeholder opinions with respect to (1) the perceptions of barriers to Drug and Therapeutics Committee (DTC) policy implementation and (2) ways to improve DTC policy implementation.

Methods

Stakeholders of Australian DTCs participated in focus group discussions. Discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Thematic content analysis was conducted.

Results

Six focus group discussions were conducted. A number of barriers were identified (lack of resources, lack of follow-up, lack of ownership, low DTC profile within the organization, and overreliance on pharmacy to implement policy). Participants were of the opinion that prioritizing decisions, optimizing pharmacy roles, provision of real-time information, and active procurement of organizational commitment were some of the ways to improve DTC policy implementation.

Conclusions

Although this study was conducted in an Australian setting, the challenges facing DTCs in other countries are likely to be similar. Ownership, social influence, and resources are important issues in the implementation of policy/guidelines for many DTCs, both in Australia and internationally. It is expected that these issues will have an impact on policy implementation. Therefore, the findings of this study may be widely applicable. This work reinforced the notion that the significance of DTCs lies beyond decision making alone. The time and expertise invested in decision making could be undermined, if DTC policies are not effectively implemented.

Keywords: Drug and Therapeutics Committees (DTCs), barriers to DTC policy implementation, facilitators of DTC policy implementation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1551-7411(05)00095-1

doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.09.001

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 1, Issue 4 , Pages 526-545, December 2005