Understanding practice change in community pharmacy: A qualitative study in Australia

Roberts, Alison S.; Benrimoj, S.I. (Charlie); Chen, Timothy F.; Williams, Kylie A.; Hopp, Trine R.; Aslani, Parisa

doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.09.003

« Previous Next »Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 1, Issue 4 , Pages 546-564, December 2005

Understanding practice change in community pharmacy: A qualitative study in Australia

Alison S. Roberts, B.Pharm. (Hons.)
- Pharmacy Practice Research, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 93514445; fax: +61 2 93514391.
S.I. (Charlie) Benrimoj, Ph.D.
- Pharmacy Practice Research, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Timothy F. Chen, Ph.D.
- Pharmacy Practice Research, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Kylie A. Williams, Ph.D.
- Pharmacy Practice Research, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Trine R. Hopp, M.Sc. (Pharm.)
- Department of Social Pharmacy and FKL—Research Centre for Quality in Medicine Use, The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universitetsparken 2, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
Parisa Aslani, Ph.D.
- Pharmacy Practice Research, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

Abstract

Background

Much of the research on cognitive pharmaceutical services has focused on understanding or changing community pharmacist behaviour, with few studies focusing on the pharmacy as the unit of analysis or considering the whole profession as an organisation.

Objectives

To investigate practice change and identify facilitators of this process in community pharmacy, with specific focus on the implementation of cognitive pharmaceutical services (CPS) and related programs.

Methods

Thirty-six in-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with participants from 2 groups, community pharmacies and pharmacy “strategists,” in Australia. The interview guide was based on a framework of organizational theory, with 5 subject areas: roles and goals of participants in relation to practice change; experiences with CPS; change strategies used; networks important to the change process; and business impacts of CPS. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically content analyzed, using NVivo software for data management.

Results

Five key themes relating to the change process were derived from the interviews: change strategies (process- and behaviorally oriented); social networks (within and beyond the pharmacy); drivers of change (eg, government policy); motivators (eg, professional satisfaction); and facilitators of practice change (remuneration for implementation or service delivery, communication and teamwork, leadership, task delegation, external support or assistance, and reorganization of structure and function).

Conclusion

The use of an organizational perspective yielded rich data from which an understanding of the practice change process in relation to CPS implementation was gained. Current programs for the implementation and delivery of CPS have not taken into account all of the factors that have the ability to facilitate change in community pharmacy. Not only do future programs need to be underpinned by these elements, but policy makers must include them when planning remuneration and dissemination strategies.

Keywords: Australia, Community pharmacy, Cognitive pharmaceutical services, Change, Facilitator, Implementation