Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 6, Issue 3 , Pages 196-208, September 2010

Use of complementary and alternative medicine for treatment among African-Americans: a multivariate analysis

  • Jamie C. Barner, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Pharmacy Administration Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0124, USA
    • Center for Pharmacoeconomic Studies, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0124, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 512 471 5612; fax: +1 512 471 8762.
  • ,
  • Thomas M. Bohman, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Social Work Research, School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0124, USA
  • ,
  • Carolyn M. Brown, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Pharmacy Administration Division, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0124, USA
    • Center for Pharmacoeconomic Studies, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0124, USA
  • ,
  • Kristin M. Richards, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Pharmacoeconomic Studies, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0124, USA

published online 19 October 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is substantial among African-Americans; however, research on characteristics of African-Americans who use CAM to treat specific conditions is scarce.

Objective

To determine what predisposing, enabling, need, and disease-state factors are related to CAM use for treatment among a nationally representative sample of African-Americans.

Methods

A cross-sectional study design was employed using the 2002 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). A nationwide representative sample of adult (≥18 years) African-Americans who used CAM in the past 12 months (n=16,113,651 weighted; n=2,952 unweighted) was included. The Andersen Health Care Utilization Model served as the framework with CAM use for treatment as the main outcome measure. Independent variables included the following: predisposing (eg, age, gender, and education); enabling (eg, income, employment, and access to care); need (eg, health status, physician visits, and prescription medication use); and disease state (ie, most prevalent conditions among African-Americans) factors. Multivariate logistic regression was used to address the study objective.

Results

Approximately 1 in 5 (20.2%) who used CAM in the past 12 months used CAM to treat a specific condition. Ten of the 15 CAM modalities were used primarily for treatment by African-Americans. CAM for treatment was significantly (P<.05) associated with the following factors: graduate education, smaller family size, higher income, region (northeast, midwest, west more likely than south), depression/anxiety, more physician visits, less likely to engage in preventive care, more frequent exercise behavior, more activities of daily living (ADL) limitations, and neck pain.

Conclusions

Twenty percent of African-Americans who used CAM in the past year were treating a specific condition. Alternative medical systems, manipulative and body-based therapies, and folk medicine, prayer, biofeedback, and energy/Reiki were used most often. Health care professionals should routinely ask patients about the use of CAM, but when encountering African-Americans, there may be a number of factors that may serve as cues for further inquiry.

Keywords: African-American, Andersen Health care Utilization Model, CAM, CAM for treatment complementary/alternative medicine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1551-7411(09)00103-X

doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2009.08.001

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 6, Issue 3 , Pages 196-208, September 2010