Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 7, Issue 2 , Pages 192-201 , June 2011

Research funding expectations as a function of faculty teaching/administrative workload

References 

  1. Broedel-Zaugg K, Henderson ML, Ohvall RA. Factors utilized by pharmacy faculty in selecting their first academic position. Am J Pharm Educ. 1997;61:384–387
  2. Carter O, Nathisuwan S, Stoddard GJ, Munger MA. Faculty turnover within academic pharmacy departments. Ann Pharmacother. 2003;37:197–201
  3. Conklin MH, Desselle SP. Job turnover intentions among pharmacy faculty. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71:Article 62, 1–9
  4. Latif DA, Grillo JA. Satisfaction of junior faculty with academic role functions. Am J Pharm Educ. 2001;65:137–143
  5. Sheaffer EA, Brown BK, Byrd DC, Gupchup GV, Mark SM, Mobley-Smith MA, et al. Variables impacting an academic pharmacy career choice. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72:Article 49, 1–9
  6. Fuller K, Maniscalco-Feichtl M, Droege M. The role of the mentor in retaining junior pharmacy faculty members. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72:Article 41, 1–5
  7. Beardsley R, Matzke GR, Rospond RM, et al. Factors influencing the pharmacy faculty workforce. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72:Article 34, 1–11
  8. Penna RP. Academic pharmacy's own workforce crisis. Am J Pharm Educ. 2001;63:453–454
  9. Draugalis JR. Back to basics: the three Rs for pharmacy faculty. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68:Article 82, 1–3
  10. Draugalis JR, DiPiro JT, Zeolla MM, Schwinghammer TL. A career in academic pharmacy: opportunities, challenges, and rewards. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70:Article 17, 1–15
  11. Cadman EC. The academic physician-investigator: a crisis not to be ignored. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:401–410
  12. Buckley LM, Sanders K, Shih M, Hampton CL. Attitudes of clinical faculty about career progress, career success and recognition, and commitment to academic medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2625–2629
  13. Smesny AL, Williams JS, Brazeau GA, Weber RJ, Matthews HW, Das SK. Barriers to scholarship in dentistry, medicine, nursing, and pharmacy practice faculty. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71:Article 9, 1–9
  14. Wolfgang AP, Gupchup GV, Plake KS. Relative importance of performance criteria in promotion and tenure decisions: perceptions of pharmacy faculty members. Am J Pharm Educ. 1995;59:342–347
  15. Robles JR, Youmans SL, Byrd DC, Polk RE. Perceived barriers to scholarship and research among pharmacy practice faculty: survey report from the AACP scholarship/research faculty development task force. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73:Article 17, 1–11
  16. Miller KW. The elephant in the room: NIH funding of faculty-initiated award proposals. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70:Article 16, 1–2
  17. Fairweather JS, Beach AL. Variations in faculty work at research universities: implications for state and institutional policy. Rev Higher Educ. 2002;26:97–115
  18. Ehrenbert RG, Rizzo MJ. Financial forces and the future of American higher education. [Feature Article]. Available at: Academe. July 29, 2009;http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2004/JA/Feat/ehre.htmAccessed 29.07.09
  19. Draugalis JR, Plaza CM. Best practices for survey research reports revisited: implications of target population, probability sampling, and response rate. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73:Article 142, 1–3
  20. Fowler FJ. Survey Research Methods. 4th ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2009;49–66
  21. Radwin D. High response rates don't ensure survey accuracy. Chronicle Higher Educ. 2009;56(7):B8–B9

PII: S1551-7411(10)00061-6

doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.04.006

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 7, Issue 2 , Pages 192-201 , June 2011

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution