Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 7, Issue 3 , Pages 211-223, September 2011

An organizational culture gap analysis in 6 New Zealand community pharmacies

  • Shane L. Scahill, B.Pharm., M.Mgt.

      Affiliations

    • School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +064 9 373 7599 ext 89442; fax: +064 9 367 7192.
  • ,
  • Peter Carswell, B.Sc., M.Com., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Health Systems, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private bag 92019 Auckland, New Zealand
  • ,
  • Jeff Harrison, B.Sc.(Hons), Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

published online 26 July 2010.

Abstract 

Background

The barriers to moving forward and meeting the expectations of policy makers and professional pharmacy bodies appear to relate to the organizational culture of community pharmacy. Despite the importance of cultural change for business transformation, organizational culture has largely gone unnoticed in community pharmacy practice research.

Objectives

To perform an organizational culture gap analysis in 6 New Zealand community pharmacies.

Methods

Mean scores from a cultural rating survey (n=47) were calculated for 8 cultural clusters and mapped onto a typical and a beneficial pattern match (ladder diagram) for each case site. These ladder diagrams provide an understanding of the gap between the 2 ratings based on the gradient of the lines joining cultural clusters—the rungs of the ladder. Software can be used to generate a Pearson correlation describing the strength of the relationship between the typical and beneficial ratings.

Results

Eight cultural clusters were mapped: “leadership and staff management”; “valuing each other and the team”; “free-thinking, fun and, open to challenge”; “trusted behavior”; “customer relations”; “focus on external integration”; “provision of systematic advice”; and the “embracing of innovation.” Analysis suggested a high level of correlation between the means of the typical and beneficial ratings. Although the variance between average ratings might be quite small, the relative difference can still be meaningful to participants in the cultural setting. The diagrams suggest a requirement for external integration, the provision of systematic advice, and the embracing of innovation to become more typical in most pharmacies. Trusted behavior is the most typical and most beneficial cultural dimension in most pharmacies, whereas valuing each other and the team is the least beneficial.

Conclusions

Gaps in organizational culture have been identified through the use of a rating survey. The dimensions of focus on external integration, providing systematic advice, and embracing innovation require further exploration through interviews in case site pharmacies.

Keywords: Organizational culture, Gap analysis, Community pharmacy, Concept mapping, Pattern matching

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1551-7411(10)00073-2

doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2010.06.002

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Volume 7, Issue 3 , Pages 211-223, September 2011